A site where you can find recommended contractors for non-clinical testing|effical " list of animal models " Humanized immune system mice (HIS mice)

Humanized immune system mice (HIS mice)

Humanized immune system (HIS) model mice continue to evolve as a core platform for the preclinical evaluation of immunotherapy. This article provides an overview of their fundamentals, standard protocols, and the trends in next-generation models, along with key points for their application in drug discovery research.

Why is the reconstruction of the "human immune system" necessary?

The background requiring humanized immune system (HIS) mice is the challenge that conventional animal models cannot sufficiently reproduce human-specific immune responses. In particular, advanced immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cells, and bispecific antibodies rely heavily on the precise interactions between human immune cells.It is difficult to accurately evaluate the efficacy and safety of drugs in the mouse immune system.As a result, HIS mice, which possess human-derived immune cells in their bodies, have become the global standard in drug discovery research as a model capable of reproducing human immune responses *in vivo*. They are also widely utilized as indispensable tools for elucidating human-specific immune mechanisms and verifying novel therapeutic strategies in research on tumor immunity, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases.

Standard Review: HIS Model Basics and Standard Protocols

Understanding the humanized immune system mouse (HIS model) is essential, requiring a grasp of basic concepts and standard production protocols. Here, we select a representative and widely referenced review to summarize the key points of the model's fundamental structure and reproducible methods.

[Standard 1] Classification of HIS Models and Establishment of Platforms

This review by Shultz et al. is,Comprehensive review that greatly contributed to the establishment of humanized immune system mice (HIS model)This document systematically organizes the background of developing immunodeficient mouse strains, particularly those centered on NSG mice, and the characteristics of the HSC (CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell) transplantation model and PBMC transplantation model built upon them. The HSC model, while capable of multilineage differentiation and long-term immune reconstitution, faces the challenge of requiring time for maturation. In contrast, the PBMC model can rapidly reproduce human T cell responses but is limited to short-term evaluation due to the high risk of GVHD. This paper clearly compares the advantages and limitations of each model, providing guidelines for selecting the appropriate platform based on research objectives.

[Standard 2] Validation of predictive ability in preclinical studies

This review by Walsh et al.A systematic review examining the extent to which humanized mice (HIS models) can predict human responses in preclinical studies.This report organizes the reproducibility of immune responses using HSC and PBMC transplant models, and their applications in tumor immunity and infectious disease models, demonstrating their usefulness in reproducing human-specific immune responses. In particular, it emphasizes the correlation with clinical outcomes observed to a certain extent in the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cell therapies. On the other hand, limitations affecting predictive power, such as discrepancies in cytokine environments and the difficulty of complete immune cell maturation, are also pointed out, and directions for model improvement are discussed.

Latest Review: Trends in Next-Generation HIS Models (2024-2026)

Recent research on HIS models has evolved from the traditional "transplantation of human immune cells" towards recreating a physiological environment closer to that of humans. Here, we present a review of the trends for 2024-2026.

[Trend 1] Next-generation (Cytokine-supported) HIS mice

Next-generation (cytokine-supported) HIS mice areSignificantly improved the reconstitution of myeloid cells and NK cells, which was insufficient in conventional modelsThey are attracting attention for their ability to reproduce human immune responses. Representative models such as NSG-SGM3 and NOG-EXL have been developed by introducing human cytokines like IL-3, GM-CSF, M-CSF, and SCF. This promotes the differentiation and maturation of human-derived macrophages, dendritic cells, and monocytic cells, thereby improving the reproducibility of the innate immune system. These models enable the analysis of the behavior of immunosuppressive macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME), contributing to the elucidation of the mechanisms of action of immunotherapies. On the other hand, NSG-SGM3 has been reported to have issues such as myeloid overactivation and short lifespan due to excessive cytokine expression, making comparative studies with improved strains like NOG-EXL, which exhibit more physiological expression, crucial.

[Trend 2] PDX x Spatial Omics x AI

Combining PDX (Patient-Derived Xenograft) and HIS models with integrated spatial omics and AI analysis is the next-generation trend in tumor immunology research.and is attracting attention. In conventional PBMC transplantation systems, GVHD (Graft-versus-Host Disease) developed early, making long-term observation difficult. However, with HSC transplantation and the use of improved immunodeficient strains, it has become possible to maintain a more stable human immune environment. By visualizing the spatial arrangement and interactions of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) at high resolution using spatial transcriptomics and other methods, and by comprehensively elucidating the mechanisms of immune response and therapeutic resistance through pattern analysis using AI, it has become possible. The ability to track long-term tumor progression and treatment response represents a significant advancement in the application to personalized medicine.

Disease Area Specific Major Review List

The optimal HIS model varies greatly depending on the disease area and the modality being evaluated. Each model has characteristics in terms of the immune functions it can reproduce and the phenomena it can observe, making it important to select the one that is appropriate for the intended purpose. Here, we organize recommended HIS models and evaluation points to focus on in reviews for each major application area.

Target of evaluation (modality) Recommended HIS model Points to consider in a review
Immune checkpoint inhibitor HSC-HIS (CD34+) T cell exhaustion and reactivation reproducibility
CAR-T / TCR-T cells PBMC-HIS or NSG CRS (Cytokine Storm) Prediction and Safety Assessment
ADC / ADCC-active antibody Myeloid-enhanced HIS Contribution of NK cells and macrophages to cytotoxic effects
Blood cancer (Leukemia/Lymphoma) HIS-PDX (Patient-Derived Hematologic Malignancy) Tumor engraftment and immune evasion mechanisms within the bone marrow microenvironment

Strategic Perspective: Improving Seed Exploration Accuracy

To improve the accuracy of seed exploration using the HIS model,Experimental design that assumes variability between donors is essential.Because human immune cells vary significantly in phenotype and function by donor, evaluations that rely on a single donor have limitations in reproducibility and external validity. For this reason, it is important to standardize multi-donor validation to understand the consistency and range of variability in responses. Furthermore, by combining with PDX, it is possible to select leads with higher predictive power closer to the clinic by evaluating the interaction between patient-derived tumors and diverse immune backgrounds.

Summary

We have looked at the necessity of HIS models, from basic classification and standard protocols to the advancement of next-generation models. In addition to understanding the characteristics of HSC and PBMC models, cytokine-driven and PDX-integrated models have greatly improved the reproducibility of human immune responses and the predictive accuracy in preclinical studies. On the other hand, challenges such as inter-donor variability and GVHD remain important, and multi-donor validation and appropriate model selection are essential for improving the accuracy of seed discovery.

3 Recommended Contract Research Organizations for Non-Clinical Studies
— by Target goal and Expertise

In drug discovery, the quality and efficiency of non-clinical studies have a direct impact on clinical success rates, development costs, and overall length of time required in R&D. In recent years, there has been more demand for clinically relevant data, globally accepted reliability, and accurate early-stage screening. Thus, it is more important than ever to select the right CRO (Contract Research Organization) for strategic approach.
In this article, we highlight three CROs with proven technical capabilities, expertise, and long standing track records. These are our TOP 3 choices based on their capabilities and the specific target goals of the researchers for their non-clinical studies.

Pharmacology (Efficacy) Studies
Replicate unknown pathological models and
Discovery to clinically oriented drug evaluation
SMC Laboratories, Inc.
SMC Laboratories, Inc.
Reference: SMC Laboratories official website (https://www.smccro-lab.com/jp/)
  • SMC Laboratories has established a disease models using patented mouse technologies. The company has established proprietary pathological models—particularly in liver disease and fibrosis—and continues to expand their approach across a wide range of models in cancer, inflammation, and metabolic diseases.
  • From exploratory research to clinically oriented efficacy evaluation, SMC offers customized study designs, dosing strategies, and evaluation analysis tailored to each project. Their collaborative approachallows researchers to discuss and refine study plans together with SMC’s expert scientists.

  • With flexible small-scale study options and strong technical support, SMC Laboratories is an ideal partner for start-ups, biotech ventures, and academic institutions alike.
Safety Studies
Comprehensive Safety Evaluation for FIH Applications
labcorp
(Labcorp Drug Development)
labcorp
Reference: labcorp official website (https://jp.labcorp.com/)
  • labcorp provides a fully integrated GLP testing system aligned with international regulatory standards, including FDA, EMA, and PMDA requirements. All studies are conducted under ICH-compliant quality assurance, making it ready for data submission.
  • The company has extensive expertise in long-term toxicity studies such as Segment I–III reproductive and carcinogenicity studies, as well as 2-year chronic toxicity assessments.
  • labcorp’s comprehensive approach enables sponsors to efficiently outsource the entire preclinical package from toxicology, toxicokinetic (TK), and safety pharmacology study design to execution. This accelerates a path to First-in-Human (FIH) trials. For most of the global drug developers, this all-in-one service structure minimizes cost, risk, and expedite the time before advancing to clinical phase.
Pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) Studies
High-Precision Bioanalysis for Clinically Predictive PK/PD Evaluation
PhoenixBio
PhoenixBio
Source: PhoenixBio Official Website (https://phoenixbio.co.jp/)
  • PhoenixBio offers pharmacokinetic and hepatic metabolism studies using their proprietary PXB-mouse®, a humanized-liver chimeric mouse model. This platform enables the acquisition of data with high clinical correlation in ADME, drug–to-drug interaction studies, bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical stages.
  • With advanced LC-MS/MS-based bioanalysis, PhoenixBio provides aseamless workflow from plasma concentration measurement and metabolite identification to quantitative validation.

  • The company offersan integrated evaluation analysiscovering pharmacokinetics, hepatotoxicity, and safety with flexibility to accommodate complex modalities such as oligonucleotide and middle-molecule therapeutics. For compounds where hepatic metabolism is a development bottleneck—or where quantitative, reproducible exposure data are critical—PhoenixBio delivers unmatched analytical precision and consistency.

Consult Phoenix Bio for PK/PD analysis with a clinical focus
By region
list of animal models
Expertise & Track Record
3 Recommended CRO for Non-Clinical Studies