Glaucoma, retinitis pigmentosa and related conditions involve progressive loss of retinal or optic nerve function. For a nonclinical programme this area differs from most others in one respect that governs the whole package: the target tissue is reached by local administration into the eye rather than systemically, and that changes what has to be measured and what a standard toxicology design can tell you.
Differentiating retinal ganglion cells from pluripotent stem cells is an established technique rather than a single institution achievement, and the published literature has moved on to a more specific question: whether the subtypes obtained matter for what the culture is used to test.[S3] That question is the practical one for a screening application, because retinal ganglion cells are not a uniform population and a compound acting on one subtype may not be detected in a preparation dominated by another. Stem cell approaches in ocular disease more broadly are reviewed alongside their current limitations.[S4]
Three model types cover most work in this area, and they answer different questions. Models that raise intraocular pressure in the rat address glaucoma, and a systematic review compares the methods used to produce that elevation.[S1] Laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in the mouse addresses the neovascular component of macular disease, with published characterization of both the vascular progression and the accompanying retinal dysfunction.[S2] Optic nerve crush produces a defined injury to the ganglion cell axons and is used where the question is neuroprotection rather than vascular or pressure-related.[S5]
The models in this area are well established and each answers a narrow question: pressure, neovascularization or axonal injury.[S1][S2][S5] The decision that most often goes wrong is not the model but the route. A programme whose product will be injected into the eye has to be designed around that from the start, because the species choice, the tolerance assessment and the exposure calculation all follow from it.
In non-clinical development, the choice of contract research organization shapes the quality of the data and the time it takes to reach the next decision. Below, three CROs are introduced by the type of study they support: pharmacology (efficacy) studies, safety studies, and pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) studies. Each summary describes the services the company offers so that you can match a provider to your target and development objective.
SMC Laboratories is a specialized non-clinical CRO focused on in vivo pharmacology and efficacy studies using disease-relevant animal models, particularly in fibrosis, inflammation, metabolic diseases, and oncology.
SMC Laboratories offers models covering the liver, lung, kidney, intestine, and oncology. Its portfolio includes the proprietary STAM™ model for MASH, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Study plans are developed around the target biology, mechanism of action, disease stage, and development objective. Pharmacological endpoints can be combined with histopathology, biomarkers, and disease-specific readouts.
With experience from more than 1,000 studies for clients in 30 countries, SMC Laboratories supports programs from target validation and candidate selection through in vivo proof-of-concept studies.
Charles River provides non-clinical toxicology and safety assessment services for programs ranging from exploratory safety studies to IND-enabling development.
Services include single- and repeat-dose toxicology, dose-range finding, and general toxicology studies across multiple species and administration routes.
Charles River supports both non-GLP and GLP studies, allowing sponsors to progress from early safety characterization to studies intended for regulatory submissions.
Toxicology studies can be integrated with toxicokinetics, clinical pathology, histopathology, and safety pharmacology to support interpretation and IND-enabling safety packages.
Inotiv provides integrated PK/PD, DMPK, and bioanalytical services to characterize drug exposure and its relationship with pharmacological response.
PK studies characterize exposure, half-life, clearance, and other pharmacokinetic parameters needed to understand how a candidate behaves in the selected model.
Pharmacokinetic data can be combined with pharmacodynamic endpoints and bioanalysis to evaluate the relationship between drug exposure and pharmacological response.
Integrated DMPK, pharmacology, and safety information supports candidate comparison, dose selection, dosing-frequency optimization, and decisions about subsequent preclinical development.