Nonclinical Efficacy Testing » Therapeutic areas, and how the nonclinical thinking differs in each » Nonclinical work in retinal and optic nerve disease

Nonclinical work in retinal and optic nerve disease

Table of Contents
Table of Contents

Glaucoma, retinitis pigmentosa and related conditions involve progressive loss of retinal or optic nerve function. For a nonclinical programme this area differs from most others in one respect that governs the whole package: the target tissue is reached by local administration into the eye rather than systemically, and that changes what has to be measured and what a standard toxicology design can tell you.

Stem-cell-derived retinal neurons

Differentiating retinal ganglion cells from pluripotent stem cells is an established technique rather than a single institution achievement, and the published literature has moved on to a more specific question: whether the subtypes obtained matter for what the culture is used to test.[S3] That question is the practical one for a screening application, because retinal ganglion cells are not a uniform population and a compound acting on one subtype may not be detected in a preparation dominated by another. Stem cell approaches in ocular disease more broadly are reviewed alongside their current limitations.[S4]

The animal models

Three model types cover most work in this area, and they answer different questions. Models that raise intraocular pressure in the rat address glaucoma, and a systematic review compares the methods used to produce that elevation.[S1] Laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in the mouse addresses the neovascular component of macular disease, with published characterization of both the vascular progression and the accompanying retinal dysfunction.[S2] Optic nerve crush produces a defined injury to the ganglion cell axons and is used where the question is neuroprotection rather than vascular or pressure-related.[S5]

What to settle before placing the work

  • {'items': ['The route, stated as it will be in patients. An intravitreal product tested by systemic administration has not been tested.', 'Whether the species eye can accommodate that route at the intended volume, which often decides the species before any other consideration does.', 'How local tolerance will be assessed, by whom, and against what scoring system.', 'How systemic exposure from a local dose will be measured, since the systemic safety assessment rests on it rather than on the administered amount.', 'For a cell-based product, which cell types the preparation actually contains, given that retinal ganglion cell preparations are heterogeneous.[S3]', 'Which studies are exploratory pharmacology, normally outside the good laboratory practice regulation, and which support the submission.[S7][S8]']}

Summary

The models in this area are well established and each answers a narrow question: pressure, neovascularization or axonal injury.[S1][S2][S5] The decision that most often goes wrong is not the model but the route. A programme whose product will be injected into the eye has to be designed around that from the start, because the species choice, the tolerance assessment and the exposure calculation all follow from it.

References

  1. Wistar rat model experiments for increasing intraocular pressure: a systematic review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 2026-09-03)
  2. Neovascular Progression and Retinal Dysfunction in the Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization Mouse Model. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 2026-09-03)
  3. In Vitro retinal ganglion cell differentiation and enrichment under the scope: do subtypes matter?(PMID 41777802). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 2026-09-03)
  4. Role of stem cells in ocular diseases: Progress and challenges. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 2026-09-03)
  5. Extracellular vesicles subpopulation derived of clonal mesenchymal stem cells protected retinal ganglion cells in mouse model with optic nerve crush. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed 2026-09-03)
  6. 21 CFR 312.23(a)(8) — Pharmacology and toxicology information requirements to be included in an IND. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2023-title21-vol5/xml/CFR-2023-title21-vol5-sec312-23.xml (accessed 2026-09-03)
  7. 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (§58.1 scope). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-58 (accessed 2026-09-03)

3 Recommended Contract Research Organizations
for Non-Clinical Studies
— by Target goal and Expertise

In non-clinical development, the choice of contract research organization shapes the quality of the data and the time it takes to reach the next decision. Below, three CROs are introduced by the type of study they support: pharmacology (efficacy) studies, safety studies, and pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) studies. Each summary describes the services the company offers so that you can match a provider to your target and development objective.

Pharmacology (Efficacy) StudiesDisease-Relevant Models for
Translational Drug Evaluation
SMC Laboratories, Inc.
Reference: SMC Laboratories, Inc. official website (https://www.smccro-lab.com/)

SMC Laboratories, Inc.

SMC Laboratories is a specialized non-clinical CRO focused on in vivo pharmacology and efficacy studies using disease-relevant animal models, particularly in fibrosis, inflammation, metabolic diseases, and oncology.

Areas of Expertise
Disease-Relevant Model Portfolio

SMC Laboratories offers models covering the liver, lung, kidney, intestine, and oncology. Its portfolio includes the proprietary STAM™ model for MASH, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Design Based on Target Biology

Study plans are developed around the target biology, mechanism of action, disease stage, and development objective. Pharmacological endpoints can be combined with histopathology, biomarkers, and disease-specific readouts.

Support from Target Validation to Proof of Concept

With experience from more than 1,000 studies for clients in 30 countries, SMC Laboratories supports programs from target validation and candidate selection through in vivo proof-of-concept studies.

Safety StudiesComprehensive Safety Assessment for
Preclinical Development
Charles River Laboratories
Reference: Charles River Laboratories official website (https://www.criver.com/)

Charles River Laboratories

Charles River provides non-clinical toxicology and safety assessment services for programs ranging from exploratory safety studies to IND-enabling development.

Areas of Expertise
General Toxicology Across Study Designs

Services include single- and repeat-dose toxicology, dose-range finding, and general toxicology studies across multiple species and administration routes.

Non-GLP and GLP Study Support

Charles River supports both non-GLP and GLP studies, allowing sponsors to progress from early safety characterization to studies intended for regulatory submissions.

Integrated IND-Enabling Safety Assessment

Toxicology studies can be integrated with toxicokinetics, clinical pathology, histopathology, and safety pharmacology to support interpretation and IND-enabling safety packages.

Pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) StudiesConnecting Drug Exposure with
Pharmacological Response
Inotiv
Reference: Inotiv official website (https://www.inotiv.com/)

Inotiv

Inotiv provides integrated PK/PD, DMPK, and bioanalytical services to characterize drug exposure and its relationship with pharmacological response.

Areas of Expertise
Pharmacokinetic Characterization

PK studies characterize exposure, half-life, clearance, and other pharmacokinetic parameters needed to understand how a candidate behaves in the selected model.

Exposure–Response Evaluation

Pharmacokinetic data can be combined with pharmacodynamic endpoints and bioanalysis to evaluate the relationship between drug exposure and pharmacological response.

Integrated DMPK and Development Support

Integrated DMPK, pharmacology, and safety information supports candidate comparison, dose selection, dosing-frequency optimization, and decisions about subsequent preclinical development.

By Therapeutic Area
Disease Animal Models
and Reviews
Proven Capability, Expertise and Track Record
Top 3 Non-Clinical CRO Services