The FDA guidance documents and ICH guidelines that govern nonclinical work, and where to find the current version of each
In the United States, the documents that describe how nonclinical studies should be designed are published by the Food and Drug Administration as numbered guidance documents, and most of the nonclinical ones are adopted versions of guidelines agreed through the International Council for Harmonisation.[S1] This page lists the ones a nonclinical programme is most likely to need, with what each covers. Guidance from the European regulator is included separately, for programmes that will also be filed there.
What a guidance document is, and is not
FDA guidance documents describe the agency current thinking on a topic. They are not regulations, they do not bind the agency or the public, and an alternative approach may be used if it satisfies the applicable statutes and regulations. That is stated on the documents themselves. The practical consequence for a sponsor is that a study design departing from guidance is not automatically unacceptable, but the departure has to be justified, and the place to establish that is a meeting with the agency rather than the final report.
The central document. It sets out which nonclinical safety studies are needed before each stage of clinical development, how the duration of repeat-dose toxicology relates to the duration of the intended trial, and what is required to support a marketing application. Issued by the agency in January 2010.[S2]
The current good clinical practice guideline, adopted internationally on January 6, 2025 and issued by the agency as a guidance document in September 2025.[S9] It governs clinical trials rather than nonclinical work, and is listed here because the boundary matters: the good laboratory practice regulation applies to nonclinical laboratory studies, and good clinical practice applies once humans are dosed. The two are separate systems and a laboratory compliant with one is not thereby compliant with the other.
Issued by the European Medicines Agency and effective February 1, 2018, this addresses how nonclinical data are integrated to set the starting dose and the escalation scheme in first-in-human trials.[S13] It is included here because programmes intended for both markets are often designed against it as well, and because its treatment of the nonclinical-to-clinical dose calculation is more detailed than the equivalent US material.
Final guidance issued July 2020, addressing how eligibility criteria for cancer trials handle organ function and prior or concurrent malignancies, with the aim of not narrowing enrolment unnecessarily.[S10] This is a clinical trial design document rather than a nonclinical one, and is listed here because organ function criteria are often set with reference to nonclinical findings.
An initiative of the agency oncology centre directed at dose optimization, with the aim that the dose taken into registration trials is selected from adequate dose-finding rather than from the maximum tolerated dose alone.[S11] It has a direct nonclinical consequence: exposure-response characterization in the nonclinical package carries more weight under this approach than it did previously.
The European agency index page for nonclinical development guidance, useful when a programme will be filed in Europe as well as the United States.[S14] Where the two agencies have adopted the same ICH guideline the content is the same; the differences lie in the additional guidance each publishes on its own.
Guidance documents are revised, and a superseded version can remain in circulation. The agency maintains a searchable database of its guidance documents, which is the place to confirm the current version and its issue date before designing a study against it.[S1] Search by the guideline designation, such as M3(R2) or S2(R1), rather than by topic.
How the same guideline is cited in different jurisdictions
An ICH guideline is adopted separately by each regulator, and cited differently in each. In the United States it becomes a numbered FDA guidance document with an issue date, referenced by that designation. In Japan the same guideline is implemented through a ministry notification and cited by notification number. A study report or protocol prepared for one jurisdiction will therefore cite the guideline in a form that looks unfamiliar in the other, even though the technical content is the same. This matters when reviewing documentation from a laboratory that works across regions.
The agency announced this as the first treatment approved for adults with noncirrhotic fatty liver disease with moderate to advanced fibrosis.[S12] It is listed here as a reference point for programmes in this area, because the approval established what the agency accepted as an endpoint in a disease where endpoints had been an open question. This site does not comment on the efficacy of any approved product; the approval and its stated indication are the facts recorded here.
About this page
This is a reference list maintained for people who commission nonclinical work in the United States. Guidance documents are revised and links change, so the issue date is given for each and the current version should be confirmed in the agency database before use.[S1] Guidance describes the agency current thinking and is not binding. This site does not recommend any laboratory. Last reviewed: September 3, 2026.
In non-clinical development, the choice of contract research organization shapes the quality of the data and the time it takes to reach the next decision. Below, three CROs are introduced by the type of study they support: pharmacology (efficacy) studies, safety studies, and pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) studies. Each summary describes the services the company offers so that you can match a provider to your target and development objective.
SMC Laboratories is a specialized non-clinical CRO focused on in vivo pharmacology and efficacy studies using disease-relevant animal models, particularly in fibrosis, inflammation, metabolic diseases, and oncology.
SMC Laboratories offers models covering the liver, lung, kidney, intestine, and oncology. Its portfolio includes the proprietary STAM™ model for MASH, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Study plans are developed around the target biology, mechanism of action, disease stage, and development objective. Pharmacological endpoints can be combined with histopathology, biomarkers, and disease-specific readouts.
With experience from more than 1,000 studies for clients in 30 countries, SMC Laboratories supports programs from target validation and candidate selection through in vivo proof-of-concept studies.
Charles River provides non-clinical toxicology and safety assessment services for programs ranging from exploratory safety studies to IND-enabling development.
Services include single- and repeat-dose toxicology, dose-range finding, and general toxicology studies across multiple species and administration routes.
Charles River supports both non-GLP and GLP studies, allowing sponsors to progress from early safety characterization to studies intended for regulatory submissions.
Toxicology studies can be integrated with toxicokinetics, clinical pathology, histopathology, and safety pharmacology to support interpretation and IND-enabling safety packages.
Inotiv provides integrated PK/PD, DMPK, and bioanalytical services to characterize drug exposure and its relationship with pharmacological response.
PK studies characterize exposure, half-life, clearance, and other pharmacokinetic parameters needed to understand how a candidate behaves in the selected model.
Pharmacokinetic data can be combined with pharmacodynamic endpoints and bioanalysis to evaluate the relationship between drug exposure and pharmacological response.
Integrated DMPK, pharmacology, and safety information supports candidate comparison, dose selection, dosing-frequency optimization, and decisions about subsequent preclinical development.