In the design of non-clinical study evaluations, it is necessary to first define "what you want to clarify" and then combine the modality, target and mechanism of action, disease stage, model, and evaluation endpoints to suit that question.
Here, rather than simply comparing CRO company information, we comprehensively organize everything from scientific validation challenges to exposure, target binding and confirmation, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, translational biomarkers, and safety.
The pale yellow columns are the core items of the evaluation design. For the verification challenges, evaluations ranging from exposure to safety will be considered as a single package.
Even within the same disease area, required endpoints and considerations vary depending on the disease stage, modality, target, and models used. The table below organizes representative combinations and items to check.
You can view the table by scrolling up, down, left, and right.
| Disease/Area | Stage and evaluation phase | Modality | target | Mechanism of Action (MoA) | Model | animal species | scientific verification challenge | exposure | Target binding and effect confirmation | pharmacodynamics (PD) | medicinal effect | translational biomarker | Safety | evaluation technology | positive control / benchmark | Scientific notes | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tumor immunity | Established tumor | Antibody drug | PD-1 | PD-1/PD-L1 blockade | Syngeneic tumor | Mouse | Will immune checkpoint inhibition produce an antitumor effect? | Serum PK | PD-1 receptor occupancy / binding blockade | CD8 activation, Ki-67, IFN-γ, Granzyme B | Tumor volume, TGI, regression, survival | Peripheral/tumor immune phenotype | clinical pathology, histopathology, cytokine-related findings | Flow cytometry, IHC, bioanalysis, tumor measurement | anti-PD-1 (set according to model sensitivity) | Confirm the mouse cross-reactivity and tumor cell line sensitivity of the target antibody | Literature + Provider validation data |
| tumor immunity | Established tumor | Antibody drug | PD-1 | PD-1/PD-L1 blockade | Humanized mouse | Mouse | Can the pharmacology of human-specific anti-PD-1 antibodies be evaluated? | Serum PK | Human PD-1 occupancy/binding | Human T-cell activation, cytokines | Tumor burden, survival | Human immune-cell phenotype | GVHD、cytokine-related findings、tissue pathology | Flow cytometry、IHC、bioanalysis | 製品・モデルごとに設定 | Donor variability、human immune reconstitution、GVHDを考慮 | Provider validation data+文献 |
| MASH | MASH~線維化 | 低分子/抗体/核酸等 | 各薬剤標的 | 標的依存 | STAM™ | Mouse | 代謝異常を背景に炎症・線維化を改善するか | PK/tissue exposure | 標的依存 | 標的下流biomarker | Histology、fibrosis、liver injury、metabolic phenotype | ALT/AST、lipid、circulating biomarker | Clinical chemistry、histopathology | Histology、IHC、qPCR、biochemistry | 目的・病期・MoAに応じ設定 | HCCまで見るか、MASH・線維化で止めるかによって評価時点が変わる | Model validation+文献 |
| MASH | 線維化進展 | 低分子/抗体/核酸等 | 各薬剤標的 | 抗線維化/代謝改善等 | WD+CCl4 | Mouse | ongoing injury下で抗線維化作用があるか | PK/liver exposure | 標的依存 | Fibrogenic pathway marker | Fibrosis area、collagen、α-SMA、liver injury | ALT/AST、fibrosis biomarkers | Clinical chemistry、pathology | Sirius Red/Masson、IHC、qPCR、biochemistry | 目的に応じ設定 | 食餌、CCl4 dose、開始時の線維化stageを揃える必要がある | Provider protocol+validation data |
| MASH | 線維化優位 | 低分子/抗体等 | 各薬剤標的 | 抗線維化 | CCl4 fibrosis | Mouse/Rat | 代謝要因を切り離して直接的な抗線維化作用を見る | PK/tissue exposure | 標的依存 | Fibrosis pathway marker | Collagen、α-SMA、fibrosis area、hydroxyproline | Fibrosis biomarker | Pathology、clinical chemistry | Histology、IHC、qPCR、biochemical assay | 目的に応じ設定 | 代謝性MASHを再現するモデルではない | 文献+Provider protocol |
| IPF | Inflammatory-to-fibrotic phase | 低分子/抗体/核酸等 | 各薬剤標的 | 抗線維化/抗炎症等 | Bleomycin | Mouse/Rat | 肺線維化を抑え、必要に応じて肺機能も改善するか | PK/lung exposure | 標的依存 | Target-pathway marker | Ashcroft、collagen/Hyp、lung function | BALF、circulating/tissue fibrosis marker | Body weight、clinical observation、pathology | Histology、IHC、BALF、qPCR、lung function | nintedanib/pirfenidone等を目的別に検討 | 予防・治療デザイン、自然退縮、誘導法、肺葉差に注意 | Literature + Provider validation data |
| CKD/腎線維化 | Post-injury fibrosis | 低分子/抗体/核酸等 | 各薬剤標的 | 抗線維化/抗炎症 | UUO | Mouse/Rat | 腎線維化経路への直接作用があるか | PK/kidney exposure | 標的依存 | Fibrosis/inflammation pathway marker | Fibrosis area、α-SMA、collagen | Kim-1等の腎障害marker | Histopathology、body weight/clinical observation | Histology、IHC、qPCR | 目的に応じ設定 | 閉塞腎のため、腎機能readoutの解釈に制限がある | 文献+Provider protocol |
| CKD/DKD | Diabetic kidney disease | 低分子/抗体/核酸等 | 各薬剤標的 | 代謝改善/腎保護等 | db/db | Mouse | 糖尿病を背景とする腎障害を改善するか | PK | 標的依存 | Target-pathway marker | uACR、renal pathology、renal function-related endpoints | Urinary/serum renal biomarkers | Clinical chemistry、pathology | Urine chemistry、histology、IHC、qPCR | 目的に応じ設定 | 病期、週齢、系統条件によって腎表現型が変わる | Literature + Provider validation data |
| Nucleic acid medicine | Target knockdown | ASO/siRNA | RNA target | Knockdown/splice modulation | Disease-specific model | Species dependent | 標的組織で十分にノックダウンできるか | Plasma/tissue exposure | Target RNA reduction/engagement | mRNA/protein knockdown | Disease-specific efficacy endpoint | Circulating/tissue target biomarker | Liver/kidney and sequence/class-related safety as appropriate | qPCR/ddPCR、protein assay、bioanalysis、pathology | Sequence/target-specific benchmark | Species homology、delivery、標的組織分布が重要 | 規制ガイドライン+文献 |
| mRNA | Protein expression | mRNA/LNP | Encoded target | Protein expression | Disease-specific model | Species dependent | 目的組織へ送達され、機能タンパク質が発現するか | mRNA/LNP or expressed-protein exposure | Delivery/expression | Encoded protein/downstream biomarker | Disease-specific endpoint | Expression biomarker | Innate immune、local/systemic toxicity | qPCR/ddPCR、protein assay、bioanalysis、biodistribution | Platform/target-specific benchmark | LNP分布、発現持続、自然免疫活性化を分けて評価 | 規制ガイドライン+文献 |
| ADC | Target-positive tumor | ADC | Tumor antigen | Targeted payload delivery | Xenograft/PDX/other suitable tumor model | Mouse | 標的選択的にpayloadを届け、抗腫瘍効果を示すか | ADC/total Ab/payload PK | Binding/internalization | Payload PD/target modulation | TGI、regression、survival | Tumor target expression/circulating marker | On-target/off-tumor、payload-related toxicity | IHC、bioanalysis、tumor measurement、pathology | Reference ADC/payload comparator where appropriate | Target expression density、internalization、payload sensitivityが重要 | Literature + Provider validation data |
| CAR-T/細胞治療 | Target-positive tumor | 細胞治療 | Cell-surface antigen | Cell-mediated cytotoxicity | Humanized/xenograft/suitable model | Mouse | 細胞が増殖・持続し、腫瘍へ移行して抗腫瘍効果を示すか | Cell kinetics/persistence | CAR+ cells/target interaction | Expansion、activation、cytokines | Tumor burden, survival | Peripheral/tumor immune-cell kinetics | CRS-like signals、off-target tissue injury | Flow cytometry、imaging、qPCR、cytokine assay、pathology | Product-specific benchmark | Trafficking、persistence、target expression、model immune contextが重要 | 規制ガイドライン+文献 |
公開情報や検証情報がない項目は、「非対応」と判断せず、受託先への確認が必要な項目として扱います。
本表は、代表的な評価設計を比較しやすく整理したものです。実際に必要となる試験、評価項目、動物種、モデル、陽性対照、技術、根拠資料は、被験物質の特性や開発段階によって異なります。具体的な試験計画は、専門家や受託先と相談のうえ決定してください。
In drug discovery, the quality and efficiency of non-clinical studies have a direct impact on clinical success rates, development costs, and overall length of time required in R&D.
In recent years, there has been more demand for clinically relevant data, globally accepted reliability, and accurate early-stage screening.
Thus, it is more important than ever to select the right CRO (Contract Research Organization) for strategic approach.
In this article, we highlight three CROs with proven technical capabilities, expertise, and long standing track records. These are our TOP 3 choices based on their capabilities and the specific target goals of the researchers for their non-clinical studies.