EGFR inhibitors are,Acts on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on the surface of cancer cellsand are molecularly targeted drugs that suppress cancer growth by blocking signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival. They are used when abnormal EGFR function is implicated in cancer development and progression, and high therapeutic efficacy can be expected in patients with specific gene mutations. Note that there are several types of EGFR inhibitors.Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are one example.It exerts an antitumor effect by inhibiting the tyrosine kinase activity within the cell of EGFR.
There are multiple types of EGFR inhibitors, classified by their action characteristics and generation of development. Here, we will briefly introduce the characteristics of representative EGFR inhibitors widely used in clinical practice.
With EGFR inhibitors,Resistance mutations such as T790M and C797S emerge during treatmentand drug efficacy may be reduced. Non-clinical studies using resistant cell lines and organoids play an important role in overcoming this.
With EGFR inhibitors,Drug selection based on patient-specific EGFR mutations such as exon 19 deletions and L858Ris important. Therefore, evaluation using patient-derived models and the development of highly accurate biomarkers are required.
EGFR inhibitors affect not only cancer cells but also the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, and other areas such asIt also acts on EGFR in normal tissue.Therefore, on-target toxicities such as rash and diarrhea may occur. For this reason, in addition to safety and toxicity evaluations, it is important to establish disease models and efficacy evaluation systems that can more accurately predict human responses, thereby enhancing human translatability.
Resistance acquisition due to mutations such as T790M and C797S in EGFR inhibitors is a major challenge. Standard cell lines cannot fully reproduce clinical resistance, therefore,Evaluate using a combination of resistant cell lines, patient-derived organoids, and PDX models.It is important to utilize each model appropriately according to the development stage, taking into account the characteristics of each model. This allows for the evaluation of resistance mechanisms and the efficacy of next-generation drug candidates under conditions more closely resembling actual clinical practice.
Even if binding to the target is confirmed, that alone does not necessarily guarantee sufficient therapeutic efficacy. Therefore,In addition to confirming target binding by target engagement, evaluate mechanism of action and drug efficacy with biomarkers.It is important to comprehensively examine the anti-tumor effects and signal inhibition through pharmacological and pharmacological studies. Combining multiple evaluation indicators allows for a more appropriate assessment of candidate drugs.
A possible reason for lack of therapeutic effect is not the insufficient action of the drug itself, but rather that it may not be sufficiently reaching the target tissue. Therefore, along with understanding absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) through PK evaluation,Evaluate intratumoral distribution and BBB permeabilityand it is important to appropriately differentiate the causes of insufficient drug efficacy by combining this with pharmacological tests.
Since EGFR is also expressed in normal tissues,Safety assessment considering on-target toxicity is essential.By understanding toxicity risks from the early stages of development, we can reduce the risk of failure in later stages. It is also important to conduct appropriate safety studies according to the modality, such as hERG testing for cardiotoxicity assessment and ADA (anti-drug antibody) evaluation for biopharmaceuticals.
In the development of EGFR inhibitors, pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation alone is not sufficient. A system capable of consistently addressing efficacy evaluation, safety evaluation, and pathological/resistance models utilizing resistant cell lines, patient-derived organoids, and PDX models is crucial. Selecting a CRO that can provide evaluation systems tailored to the development stage leads to efficient development.
In drug discovery, the quality and efficiency of non-clinical studies have a direct impact on clinical success rates, development costs, and overall length of time required in R&D.
In recent years, there has been more demand for clinically relevant data, globally accepted reliability, and accurate early-stage screening.
Thus, it is more important than ever to select the right CRO (Contract Research Organization) for strategic approach.
In this article, we highlight three CROs with proven technical capabilities, expertise, and long standing track records. These are our TOP 3 choices based on their capabilities and the specific target goals of the researchers for their non-clinical studies.