Translucence Biosystems, Inc. is a tissue clearing and whole-brain imaging company in Irvine, California, founded in 2018 as a spin-out of the Sunil Gandhi laboratory at the University of California, Irvine.[S2] It sells both instruments and reagents and performs contract imaging work, so the first thing to establish with them is which of the two a program needs.[S3][S4] This profile summarizes the products, the contract services, stated compliance information, and company facts most relevant to US sponsors.
The product line covers the Mesoscale Imaging System, described as a modified light-sheet microscope built on a ZEISS platform; Stitchy, an image stitching software tool; and three tissue clearing kits priced between about 895 and 995 US dollars.[S3] A laboratory that intends to run imaging in house buys these. A sponsor outsourcing a study does not.
Contract work is offered as custom services and as full-pipeline services, with named applications in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and the brain distribution of therapeutic antibodies.[S4] The last of these is the application most likely to matter to a drug developer: whole-brain light-sheet imaging can show where an antibody or other biologic reaches within intact tissue, which a sectioned-slide workflow cannot show in the same way. These are anatomical and distribution readouts. They describe where a molecule went, not whether it worked, and they do not substitute for the efficacy or safety endpoints of a study.
The services page sets out two arrangements: the client performs the animal procedures and ships fixed samples, or the client works with Translucence and the animal procedures are handled as part of the engagement.[S4] Where the second route runs, and under whose oversight, is not stated on the pages reviewed. A sponsor choosing that route should establish which facility houses the animals and what oversight applies there before the study starts.
No compliance statements were found. The pages reviewed contain no GLP claim, no AAALAC accreditation, no USDA registration, no OLAW Animal Welfare Assurance, no Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee statement and no ISO or CLIA certification. For a company whose default arrangement is to receive fixed tissue, most of those would not apply; for the arrangement in which animal procedures are handled as part of the engagement, they would. That is the gap a sponsor needs to close by asking. AAALAC International accreditation is a voluntary evaluation of an institution's animal care and use program, re-evaluated every three years,[R3] and USDA registration and an OLAW Animal Welfare Assurance relate to the Animal Welfare Act and the PHS Policy respectively;[R4][R5] none of these establishes GLP compliance, which applies to individual studies.[R2] FDA does not approve or certify laboratories; registration with FDA does not denote approval.[R6]
| Legal name | Translucence Biosystems, Inc.[S2] |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | 5270 California Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, CA, United States[S2] |
| Founded | 2018, as a spin-out of the Sunil Gandhi laboratory at the University of California, Irvine[S2] |
| Ownership | Private; no stock listing and no SEC registration found[S2] |
| Employees and revenue | Not published |
| Products | Mesoscale Imaging System (a modified ZEISS light-sheet microscope); Stitchy image stitching software; three tissue clearing kits[S3] |
| Contract services | Custom services and full-pipeline services covering Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and antibody brain distribution[S4] |
| Animal handling | Either the client ships fixed samples, or animal procedures are handled as part of the engagement; the facility for the latter is not stated[S4] |
| Funding | The company states NIH BRAIN Initiative funding. A University of California, Irvine article reports two NIH SBIR awards; the term SBIR does not appear on the company site[S1][S5] |
| GLP, AAALAC, USDA, OLAW, ISO, CLIA | No statement found on the pages reviewed |
| Website | translucencebio.com |
In drug discovery, the quality and efficiency of non-clinical studies have a direct impact on clinical success rates, development costs, and overall length of time required in R&D.
In recent years, there has been more demand for clinically relevant data, globally accepted reliability, and accurate early-stage screening.
Thus, it is more important than ever to select the right CRO (Contract Research Organization) for strategic approach.
In this article, we highlight three CROs with proven technical capabilities, expertise, and long standing track records. These are our TOP 3 choices based on their capabilities and the specific target goals of the researchers for their non-clinical studies.